America’s openness liberates Mahmoud Khalil to offend our freedoms

It is a shameful matter that we are still discussing whether Mahmoud Khalil should be expelled from the United States, because This hateful fanatic It should never be allowed to apply for American soil in the first place.

Khalil, a graduate student at the former University of Colombia, who became a boy, has been a stalker for the criticism of President Donald Trump’s deportation policies, to the main headlines this week for all the wrong reasons.

in A prominent interview With Ezra Klein of the New York Times, Khalil mocked those who insisted that he was a goodwill human without anyone wrong.

“I felt fear that we had to reach this moment in the Palestinian struggle,” he said of Hamas al -Barbari’s attack on October 7 on innocent Israeli civilians.

Klein asked most possible follow -up: “What do you mean? king To reach this moment? “

“Unfortunately, we could not avoid such a moment,” Khalil repeated.

In a comic manner, if it was not about the terrible topic, Klein – at all to his evil guest – gave Khalil another opportunity to describe the greatest mass killing of the Jews since the Holocaust in a way that did not make it a vital but boring group.

but Khalil doubled three times.

He said that it was an essential evil “breaking the session” and “told the world that the Palestinians are here,” as you see.

This came just weeks after Khalil’s refusal once, not twice, but three times to condemn Hamas when he is He appeared on CNN.

He said about the anti -Semitism uprising that helped lead the campus in Colombia: “I simply asked and protested the war in Palestine,” he said about the anti -Semitic uprising that helped lead the campus in Colombia.

“This is my duty as a Palestinian, as a person at the present time, is the request to stop killing in my mother’s country.”

Critics It exploded with good anger.

White House spokeswoman Abeel Jackson noted: “Mahmoud Khalil was not shy of his support for Hamas – a brutal terrorist organization that attacks violently men, women and innocent children.”

“The description of the massacre of Israeli civilians is that a” desperate attempt “is not a political discourse – it is moral corruption,” and a member of the New York State Council Ary Braun also presented NASO.

“Mahmoud Khalil must be deported immediately,” MP Eliz Stefanick (R-Ny) announced.

The Trump administration has already tried.

When Foreign Minister Marco Rubio The deportation procedures were launched Against Khalil in March, he did this by calling for anti -Israel protests on the campus on Colombia “undermining the American policy to combat anti -Semitism around the world and the United States.”

However, even many critics of Khalil cheated in the federal government targeting the legal card holder and the green card for the attack of the attack – and The New Jersey court forced his release.

The first amendment is, after all, between the most enhanced inheritance of Americans.

Many of the heroes of free speech expressed reasonable concern that the removal of Khalil may open the door to a slippery slope from the censorship.

This concern, however, the very important question arises: Why was Khalil to enter the United States at all?

There are legal, exclusive and philosophical arguments to give all the legal population strong protection for the first modification.

But there is nothing in the constitution – and it is not included in our long American values – which forces this country to recognize hateful ideology.

Khalil is a 30 -year -old man who houses a clear fanaticism (“After I lived in the Middle East most of my life, unfortunately, the only Jew that you hear about is the person who tries to kill you,” clearer for Klein), and the tribal loyalty that prevails in the basic moral principles that face American life.

Not to mention his uncomfortable feelings towards the United States itself.

“I had my own reservations on America’s influence on Lee,” he told Klein Swugly. “As a Palestinian or a Syrian refugee in Lebanon, America’s influence in the Middle East was very negative.”

The United States is an open country, good, ready to accept people from countless cultures from all over the world.

This is an honorable instinct, and most of the time is the instinct.

But the line must be withdrawn to protect the national interest.

And if this line is weak and mysterious so that it allows a person who is unable to condemn kidnapping, torture, murder and rape for political purposes, this is not a line at all.

She “gave me tired, your poor / frozen fans yearn for free breathing,” said Emma Lazarus.

No, “Give me fanatics, and Knaves / your distinctive yearning to push the Jews to the sea.”

Now that he is here, Khalil has the right to promote his universal and oppressive global view of the United States in the largest number of “progressive” media as it is ready to inflate it.

But he does this as a living evidence for both the virtues of America – the immigration system failed.

Isaac Shur is the employee writer in Medit.