Five Techway in Canada’s liberal leadership debate

After the back-to-back debate in both English and French, candidates have made voters their case in place of Prime Minister Justin Trudeau as the leader of the liberal party in Canada.

Card-Holding Liberals will now be selected between Canada and England Mark Carne, former finance minister Cristia Fryland, House government leader Kareena Gold and former MP Frank Bileis.

The vote that wins on March 9 will be the next Prime Minister of Canada and will lead liberals in the upcoming general election, which must be done on or before October 20 of this year.

The discussion is a great focus on how Canada respond to US President Donald Trump, the US neighbor of the United States, and the Canada is a “51st state”.

There are five liberal leaderships in five big Tekwe in the debate.

How Canada responds to Canada by US President Donald Trump as a “danger” as a “existence”, has dominated the agenda in both arguments.

Trump has said that he plans to impose a 25% rate on all Canadian exports, except for energy, maximum charges will be charged at a maximum rate – economists say that the prices of American people will be destructive for Canada.

He has repeatedly proposed that a large number of Canada’s population should connect Canada to the United States who met with alarm and anger.

Former top minister freeland, who worked in Trump’s first tenure, placed himself as an experienced negotiation – and fought against the US President and his previous charge.

But Carne warned that today’s Trump was not in the past Trump. “He is more isolated. He is more aggressive,” Carne said. “He wanted our market in the past. Now we want our country.”

Gold, the youngest candidate, suggested that Canada should “put everything on the table” to protect its sovereignty, and the federal government should help businesses to diversify their portfolio to rely on the US.

Meanwhile, Bileis said that Canada needed to create a close financial relationship with the UK, New Zealand and Australia, saying that all four are all shared values, culture and government machinery.

Trump’s threats are more worrying due to Canada’s current financial situation.

Canadians have expressed frustration about the stubborn high cost of living.

Carne – Trade was a economist – a plan for a plan that will balance Canada’s operational budget in three years and Canada re -thought of the way to spend its money.

But he also mentioned his support for main liberal programs such as affordable child care and dental care.

As former Finance Minister, freeland defended her track record and said that the country’s finance was still “very strong”. In the wake of Trump’s threat to support the Canadian industries and boosting job growth, Canada has capitalized on patriotism, she said.

Bileis considers his skill as a professional to say that Canada should work on increasing its productivity.

Gold, on the other hand, said that the liberal party should be “realistic with Canadians” and it was not possible to balance the budget in three years without significant reduction, which she had no support. She said that Canada should rather focus on “modernization of his social security mesh” to help those who struggle.

“We have to face the extreme dangers of the United States, so we should be able to invest in our people and our business to protect them,” Gold said.

The four candidates were arguing with each other, but they have often submitted a joint front against their shared rivals, Pierre Polvere, the leader of the conservative party, whose party is most likely to become Canada’s next government.

The liberal leadership of the optimists made many responsibility in Polyvir during the entire debate. Gold called him “Small version of Trump at home”, said the fr from the Friday that he was planning to “imitate” Polyvere Trump.

Carne criticized Polyvre as “irresponsible” and criticized Canada as “affordable” to the Prime Minister.

In the previous election of a popular Trudeau, Polyvrees needed to go to the Canadian people from the resignation of Trudeau.

Criticizing the “broken” Canada to “first” in Canada “in the wake of the US threat changed their message. He also focuses on attacking a car with a liberal leadership race.

Polyvir is still voting at the level, but some indicates that since the exit of Trudeau, the lead between him and the liberal has declined.

All four candidates confirmed their commitment to Canada’s Ukraine support while changing the US policy on the ongoing Russia-Ukraine war.

All of them supported the need to hit 2% of Canada’s 2% military expenditure objectives according to the NATO leading promise, though they did not agree on the timeline and how to go there.

The Freeland said that Canada should reach the target by 2017 and invest in the “next generation of war”. By 2030, Canada plans to reach that purpose, Belis and Carne said.

Frimand and Carne both said that Canada needs to invest that money in Canadian military activities instead of the United States.

The Freeland states that Canada should reduce its trust in the United States and work on security promises with the European Union and other NATO partners.

Carbon tax for consumers and businesses is the basis of the Truo government’s policy on climate change.

But that tax has proved to be not popular with the Canadians, because Carne and the freeland were forced to promote that the policy would dig.

Carbon Tax has been a long -term supporter of Carbon Tax, former special UN specialists of weather action and financing. However, in the discussion, they confessed that taxes were divided into customers and said they would rather focus on focusing on taxation and clean energy projects on large pollutants in Canada.

FREELLD, who resigned from the government of the Prime Minister on the expenditure, said Freland, said that despite their policies, history will favorably justice of its climate action. But she also promised to scrap carbon tax.

“Democracy is about listening to people and Canadians are clear to us that they do not think that policy is working for them,” she said.

Gold and Bilis, on the other hand, said that they would put some versions of customer tax on carbon and say that climate change comes with battle prices.