Goodbye to me, crushing her heavy hypocrisy

President Donald Trump’s executive orders The prohibition of diversity, fairness and comprehensiveness related to gender preference has been virtually turned on the Dei industry.

But de was already on his last legs.

Half of all Americans no longer agree to Ethnic, ethnic or sexual preferences.

Di had an increase after the death of George Floyd and 120 days after the incompatible riots, intentional burning, attacks, killing and attacks on law application during the summer of 2020.

In those chaotic years, Dei was seen as an answer to ethnic tensions.

Dei had replaced the old concept of positive work-a government remedy dating back to the 1960s for historical biases against black Americans, from the legacy of slavery to the Jim Crowe chapter.

But during the Obama era, the “diversity” replaced positive action by providing preferences to many groups that exceed black Americans.

Suddenly, the Americans began to speak in Marxist diodes.

On one side, the white majority of 65 to 70 % of the “persecuted” and “victims” – often be stereotype as “white concession”, “white superiority” or even “white anger”.

They were cavity to 30 to 35 % of the “diverse” Americans, the so -called “persecuted” and “victim”.

Nevertheless almost immediately, the contradictions and hypocrisy of Dei were undermined.

First, how can one define a “diverse” in a multi -ethnic society, married, married, absorbed and integrated?

DNA badges? The old rule of one south from the south? The surface appearance?

To prove racist or ethnic evidence that it is sixteen, quarter, or half of “non -white”, employers, companies and universities must become genealogists who are obsessed with the ethnic.

However, the refusal to become ethnic auditors also allows The racists and Ethnic are fraudsters Like Senator Elizabeth Warren and New York mayor, Zahran Mamdani-to continue.

Warren falsely claimed the original American heritage to benefit from Professor Harvard.

Mamdani, the son of a migrant for the wealthy immigrants from Uganda, tried. Game of his way to college By claiming that he is an American of African origin.

Second, in America in the twenty -first century, the layer is increasingly different from race.

Mam. Promotes of taxes The “wealthy” and “whiteness” at higher rates are the same as the Indian migrant child, and the richest ethnic group in America.

Why do Barack Obama, Joy Reed or Liberon James need any special preferences, given the multiple millionaire situation for their parents?

In other words, the surface appearance of one necessarily determines the per capita income or wealth, and does not specify the “concession” or its absence.

Third, Dei is often associated with “compensation” issues. The current white majority is supposed to condemn certain groups of financial or entitlement compensation to the sins of the past.

However, in today’s multi -ethnic and multi -ethnic society, it has not been born more than 50 million people in the United States, and many have recently arrived recently, what are the historical or previous grievances that would gain anyone special treatment?

What is the injustice that the last expatriates can demand from southern Mexico, South Korea or Chad, and they know little about any indirect bias, and do not suffer from any direct bias from Americans or the United States or its history?

Is DEI logic that when a single -footed Guatemia crosses across the southern border, it is suddenly classified as a victim of white repression, and therefore it is entitled to preferences to employ or employment?

Fourth, is the word “minority” still carrying any currency?

In California today, the demography decreased by 40 % Latin, 34 % of eggs, 16 % of the American or the Pacific Islands, 6 % black, and another 3 % – with no large majority and less than eggs than the Latin “minority”. Is the Latinians the “majority”, “eggs” and “eggs” are just one of the other four “minorities”?

Do other minorities, then, have grievances against the Latinists, given that they are the dominant population of the state?

Fifth, when does “relative representation” apply, and when not?

Is the eggs “represented exaggerated” among the colleges of universities in the country, and it is said that 75 % of the eggs, when they do not make up only about 70 % of the population?

Or, is the eggs “represented” as university students, and they constitute only 55 % of them, and therefore need Dei to raise their numbers?

Black athletes are excessively represented in profitable and prestigious professional sports.

To correct such similar, is it necessary to give the Asians and Latinians a detailed stakes for the Qurtubbere sites or the point guard to ensure the appropriate sporting “diversity, fairness and integration”?

Sixth, Dei determines good and bad prejudices, as well as the right and incorrect prejudices. Graduation is “rapprochement” – black, of Spanish origin, Asian and gay – “confirmation”.

But will a graduation ceremony be considered a similar convergence for European or Jewish “racists”?

Is a house being actually condemned on the California campus “enlightened”, while European -American housing is being convicted as incendiary?

In fact, de It has long become corruptThe collapse is under the weight of its paradoxes and hypocrisy.

It is an exciting idea – unable to determine who qualifies for preference or why, who is excessively represented or not, or when bias is acceptable or unfair.

It is time to disappear.

Victor Davis Hanson is a distinguished colleague at the American Great Center.