Google unanimously loses the decision of the Court of Appeal on the Android store as an illegal monopoly

The ruling by the consensus issued by the Court of Appeal in the ninth district provides a double -style legal blow to Google, which was amended in three separate. Anti -monopoly experiments This has led to the declaration of different columns of its Internet Empire as Scofflaws since late 2023.

The unsuccessful appeal represents a great victory for epic game for manufacturing video games, which launched a legal cruciferial targeting the Google Play Store for Android apps and the Apple iPhone application store for nearly five years in an attempt to overcome exclusive payment systems of 15 % to 30 % on transactions within the application.

jury December 2023 reprimand The Google App Store for Android Smartphone App Store started with a set of setbacks that include monopoly provisions against the company The search engine everywhere last year and The technology behind its digital advertising network Earlier this year.

Although it is not profitable like the search engine or the Google Advertising System, the Play for Android store has long been a golden mine that has achieved billions of dollars from annual revenue by obtaining a reduction from 15 % to 30 % of the transactions within the application via the company’s payment system.

After a month -long experiment, a jury of nine people decided that Google falsified its system to thwart alternative application stores from providing better deals for consumers and software developers. This ruling led to American boycott judge James Donato request Google to destroy the digital walls that protect the Play Store from the competition, which led to the company’s attractiveness to cancel the discovery of the jury and exhaustion of the judge.

But a painting of three judges I heard Google’s attractiveness In February, her lawyers claimed that Donato made a mistake by allowing the case to be identified by a jury that deviated from the definition of the market specified by Another federal judge often stood with Apple In the issue of Epic against the iPhone maker app.

The referees wrote in the decision that the lawsuit spent by EPIC “was full of evidence that Google’s anti -competition behavior, causing the Play Store to benefit from the effects of the network.”

Unless Google can extend the delay in the implementation that was placed based on the Donato order issued last October, the company will have to start a repair process that includes making the entire Play Store Google has argued that the required reviews will raise the risks of privacy and security by exposing consumers to the fraud process of artists and infiltrators who deny it as legal applications.

But EPIC lawyers have mocked Google’s warnings about changes such as intimidation tactics in a desperate attempt to protect the company’s patriarchal wealth.

Although EPIC was shortened in its attempt to announce the iPhone App Store in a monopoly, this situation has performed A judge issued an order This requires Apple to deliver exclusive control of payment processing for transactions within the application and allowing links to alternative systems without collecting a commission.

Besides being exposed to Donato, Google still faces more troubles that may leave a larger debit in its financial resources.

As part of the efforts made to address the illegal Google monopoly in research,, The federal judge weighs a proposal Through the US Department of Justice, which requires the sale of Chrome web browser and the prohibition of deals worth millions of dollars in Apple and others to lock its search engine as a major Internet portal.

Google also faces Disconcplement of advertising technology As part of the counter -measures to monopolize this work. A trial on this proposal is scheduled to start in September.