Is moving from the US allies as they move on Israel’s Gaza plan

The announcement made by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has planned to control all the Gaza strip.

But one is, at least so far, the US government has given one to say and greeted by collective Shrug.

On Tuesday, President Donald Trump said that “Israel is up to Israel” whether Gaza should be fully occupied. And when he asked the next day, he was giving Israel a “green light”, instead of the beginning of this year, he talked about the US attacks on Iran at the beginning of this year.

Washington’s Israeli ambassador Mike Hakbi was more directly – and the answer is that Netanyahu’s Gaza plan is not a concern for the United States.

They said, “It is not my job to tell them what to do or what to do,” he said. “Of course, if they ask for wisdom, advice, advice, I am sure that the President will give it. But in the end, Israeli and only Israeli can only do Israeli.”

Netanyahu has been shown some opposition to his plan – especially according to Israeli media, arguing against a full -level business.

In the announcement of the Israeli Security Cabinet meeting, the Israeli Gaza does not say that he will control the entire territory of the bar, but instead he will “prepare to control the city of Ghaza”.

However, it was mentioned that one of the five principles of war ending was “Israeli security control in the Gaza strip”.

Some have suggested that the entire acquisition of Gaza is always on the table.

Emergency Professor Amin Cycle of the Middle East, Central Asian and Islamic Studies of the Australian National University told the BBC, “Netanyahu had always planned to take possession of Gaza, waiting for the right moment.”

Netanyahu has suggested that Israel does not want to keep this region, but “hand over the Arab army” – which did not specify.

However, no public indications that the Trump administration is wrong with Netanyahu.

It shows remarkable changes in the strategy of the White House. Trump was not ready to outline his thoughts about Gaza’s future – when he surprised Netanyahu and Israeli.

In February, during his second presidential tenure, he said that the United States could be deeply involved in the reorganization of Gaza as a world resort and suggested that Palestine people had to be replaced outside the region.

When the US joined Israel to attack Iran’s nuclear facilities in a brief conflict between the two nations in June, Trump publicly and strongly pressured Israel that the conflict ended.

Last month, the Americans also regretted the Israeli attacks on Syria – publicly refused, while in private, they criticized it.

An official of the White House told Axios News website, “Bibi behaved like crazy.” “He bombs everything every time.”

The White House has also invested in the end of the war, before Trump took over in January, Netanyahu was pressured to ban the war.

Real estate magnets Steve Vitkop, a broad diplomatic portfolio in Trump White House, have become a point for this negotiation, and has tried to carry out a permanent war ban with Hamas in the October October 223 attack.

Recently, a month ago, the White House was optimistic that a contract was out of reach.

“We hope that we will have a contract this weekend that will bring us in a 60 -day war period,” Witcouff said on July 8 that it could give “lasting peace in Ghaz”.

But after two weeks, the war was broken, and the Vitakoff was publicly accusing Hamas of being selfish and not doing good faith.

Trump said on July July 7, “Hamas did not really want to contract.” “I think they are going to die and that is very bad.”

Trump’s comments – and his decision to abandon the discussion with Hamas and his decision to be suspicious of the new Israeli military action is – may be a move created to force the Palestinian group to give a new concession to the negotiation table.

If so, it will soon be clear enough.

Australian National University Professor Cycle said, “The Trump administration has benefited greatly.” I think Netanyahu will not move without any kind of consent or cultured support from Washington. “

This American change from public disapproval to a clear distance, however, may be part of an attempt by the President to return to his intervention – he temporarily released during the Iranian wealth, which is on part of his political bottom.

Frank Lowancestine, a special envoy of Israeli-Palestine negotiations during the Barack Obama administration, told the BBC, “The concern is that it is inconsistent with the US’s first policy in this terrible war.”

“But far now, I think Trump is going to allow Netanyahu to do whatever he wants.”

If so, Trump’s position is very different compared to the recent statements made by France, the UK and Canada regarding the approval of the Palestine state. These movements were designed to bring military action on Israel and to bring additional pressure to reach the negotiation settlement with Hamas.

She studied the possibility of the Israeli military business – the US and its associates, and its allies, clearly taken to different directions – – and possibly uncertain – the United States long – and possibly uncertain.

But both of them confess that the current situation is unstable and a confession that a negotiation peace is far from before.

With Trump, it does not say how long this trend will last. But as Trump changed the course again, it would be very difficult to revert to the Israeli Gaza.

Follow the twist and turns of Trump’s second term with the weekly of North America Hrinthoni Zurch Unscan Newspaper. Readers in the UK can Sign up here?? UK outside people can do this Sign up here??