NASA to create nuclear reactor on the moon by 2030

The US Space Agency NASA NASA will make a faster-track plans to create a reactor on the moon by 2030, American media said.

This is part of the US ambition for creating a permanent support for humans to live on the surface of the moon.

According to Polytico, NASA’s executive heads mentioned similar plans in China and Russia, and they said that they could “possibly declare an additional area” on the two countries on the moon.

But if the recent and NASA budget cuts, there are questions about how realistic the goals and periods are, and some scientists are worried that these plans are run by geographical -political goals.

Nations, including the US, China, Russia, India and Japan, are rushing to search for the surface of the moon, some planning are permanent human colonies.

According to New York Times, “This serious technology needs to be properly progressed to create high energy energy generation on Mars and strengthening its national security in space,” New York Times wrote to Nasa Dafi NASA.

Mr. Dafi demanded the proposals of commercial companies that at least 100 kW of electricity could be generated to create reactor.

It’s relatively small. A common wind turbine on the coast generates 2-3 MW.

The idea of building a separate reactor as a source of energy on the moon is not new.

In 2, NASA signed a three m 5 meter agreement to the companies to design a reactor.

And in May this year, China and Russia planned to create an automatic nuclear power station on the moon by 2035.

Many scientists agree that this will be the best or probably the only way to provide constant power on the surface of the moon.

A lunar day is equivalent to four weeks on the earth, which is made up of two weeks of continuous sunlight and two weeks of darkness. This makes it very challenging to depend on solar energy.

“Small employees. To accommodate the moon’s residence, the Magawat-scale will demand the creation of electricity. Solar array and batteries cannot meet those demands only.”

He continued, “Nuclear energy is not only desirable but it is inevitable.”

Lionel Wilson, a professor of earth and planetary science of Lancaster University, believes that keeping reactor on the moon is technically possible, with the “commitment of enough money” by 2030, and he highlighted that there are already designs for small nuclear reactors.

He said, “Enough artemis is just a matter of creating infrastructure on the moon,” he said, “NASA’s Artemis Spaceflit program, which sent people and accessories to the moon.

There are also some questions around security.

Open University’s Planetary Science Specialist Dr. Simon Barber says, “Starting radioactive material through the earth’s atmosphere creates a concern of safety. You must have a special license to do it, but that is not incredible.”

After the recent confusion in NASA, the instructions of Shri Dafi were surprised after the Mr. Trump’s administration announced a 5 % reduction in NASA’s budget in 226.

They include the deduction of important science programs such as the sample return of Mars, the purpose of the purpose is to return the earth from the surface of the planet.

Scientists are also concerned that this announcement is a politically inspiring moon in the new international race of the moon.

“It seems that we are returning to the day of the old first leisure race of competition, which is a little frustrating and relevant from a scientific point of view,” says Dr. Barber.

“Competition can create novelty, but if focus on national interest and ownership is focused, you can ignore the solar system and the larger picture beyond.”

Mr. Dafy’s comments appear to be referring to a contract called Artemis Akards about the possibility of “declaration of key-out-out zone” on the moon.

In 7, seven nations signed an agreement to establish principles on how countries should cooperate on the surface of the moon.

The cords include the so -called safety zones to install the moon -manufactured operations and the property around the property.

Dr. Barber says, “If you create a nuclear or any base on the moon, you can start claiming to be a security zone around it, as you have equipment,” says Dr. Barber.

He says, “For some people, this is the moon, ‘we are going to work here and we cannot come’.

Dr. Barber noted that there are obstacles to overcome the moon before placing the moon on the moon.

The objective of NASA’s Artemis 3 in 2027 is to send humans to the moon surface, but it has to face a series of set-back and funding uncertainty.

He said, “If you get nuclear power to the base, but if you get any way to get people and accessories there, it will not be much of use,” he added.

He said, “The plans did not join very much at the moment.”