Russiagate is lying – and everyone is watching, even the Democrats

Despite the best efforts made by the media of Russiaagate in its rejection as “Russian misleading information”, the most recent disclosure in this Barack Obama’s escalation scandal scandal Hillary Clinton in the “coup that lasted for years” against President Trump, the audience is alert and wants the presidents rolling.

According to a survey held in Rasmussen on Monday, two thirds of the voters (65 %) follow the publications that were raised during the past month by the National Intelligence Director Toulcy Gabbard and the Senator Chuck Grassley “very closely” (32 %) or “closely” (33 %) (33 %). To frame Donald Trump As Kremlin Stooge for Testim, Hillary Clinton’s violations.

A possible 1172 possible survey showed 29-31 July, that 54 % believe that the Obama administration officials committed serious crimes in “intelligence manipulation”, where 37 % said it was “very likely” and 17 % say it is “somewhat likely.”

The amazing 69 % is agreed that it is important for the perpetrators to bear the “our country’s survival”.

Democrats are also interested in

The most anxious thing for Democrats is that not only Republicans who are concerned. The poll shows that 56 % of Democrats are following the investigation, 32 % believe that serious crimes have been committed and 59 % agree that the perpetrators should be “responsible”. The republican comparison is 75 %, 83 % and 86 %.

Spanish origins are more charming about the scandal of black or white voters, as 66 % of serious crimes and 74 % want to be accountable, compared to 51 %, 65 % respectively for blacks, 53 % and 69 % respectively for eggs.

Men are more interested than women, with 74 % compared to 59 % after close stations; 60 % compared to 49 % believing that there is a serious crime. And 72 % compared to 66 % in favor of accountability.

It is evidence of the deficit of the media allied by the Democrats, such as the New York Times, the Washington Post, ABC, NBC and CBS, which is bathing in the awards of praise and Pletzer for its stories that have been transmitted since then from Russia and hope that their fans will be ready to deceive again. But like the boy who cried the wolf, no one listens.

According to the Gabbard office, ABC, CBS and NBC spent a total of 2284 minutes covering Russiaagate, yet they have been devoted only two minutes and 17 seconds to disclose the past two weeks. Even when they mention the story, try to expose it.

The Director of the CIA, Director of the CIA John Brennan, Deni James Clapper and Hillary Clinton, Mark Elias, presented them through their favorite media in a desperate attempt to extinguish the public interest.

Elias told MSNBC: “I feel like frankly, I just demand the media, I do not report this as a legitimate investigation.” ))

Huh! Very bad for Elias, he is no longer 2016.

The audience – and Donald Trump – is wise and more rated on Pikes.

The renewed scrutiny of the Obama administration’s conspiracy to sabotage Trump’s victory and the presidency of Trump for the year 2016, ”Gabbard said, beginning at early last month, when he was the director of the CIA John Ratcliffe. I released a bomb review From the evaluation of the intelligence community, which Obama ordered on December 9, 2016, which falsely claimed that Russia interfered in the 2016 presidential elections to help Trump.

The review found that Brennan, Clapper and technical director, James Kumi, “participated excessively” in the formulation of ICA, rushed before Trump took office and was forced to include the Steel Steel file, on the objections of Russian experts at the CIA, indicating “possible political movement.”

“Betrayal plot”

Trump says that “ICA” was the genesis of Russia, where he is suspicious of the legitimacy of Trump’s elections for 2016 and the sabotage of his first term, with Obama “leader”, as Trump says, and the media that the Democrats allied was decisive to its success.

Every weekand Post Compleable Miranda Devine sits for exclusive and explicit conversations with the most important disturbances in Washington. Subscribe here!

What followed the Ratcliffe bomb was a systematic version of Gabbard and Grasley for the evidence that revealed the weapons of Obama and Biden’s law enforcement and intelligence agencies against Trump.

July 18: Gabbard issued a report that the secrecy that he finds was raised at a meeting in the Oval Office on December 9, 2016, Obama directed the senior national security officials, including Clapper, Brennan, Komei, Andrew Mcabi, Susan Rice, John Kerry, Loreta Lynch, and Afriel Heinz, to create new intelligence that says to the two souls in the news of the voters in the advanced news in the number The chopped, in involvement. The assessments unlike the chest previously.

Gabbard describes the plot as “a conspiracy of betrayal by officials at the highest levels of the White House Obama to sabotage the will of the American people and try to rape the president from fulfilling the state.”

July 23: Gabbard holds a press conference at the White House to announce that it has sent criminal referrals to the Ministry of Justice and the Federal Investigation Office, Obama and the national security team in a “polite conspiracy”. It claims that Brennan is suppressing the information that shows that Russia does not prefer Trump. It also issues a permanently chosen report from the House of Representatives for the house, which has been blocked even from the committee.

It indicates that in September 2016, the Russian foreign intelligence service obtained DNC emails that show that Clinton was suffering from “intensive psychological passion” and physical problems. The Russian spies also had an email to the Clinton campaign discussing a plan to connect Trump to Putin to disperse the Americans’ attention from the Hillary email scandal.

July 30: Brennan and Cleper wrote an article in the New York Times as “clearly false” allegations from Gabbard and Ratcliffe that senior Obama administration officials manufactured Tsic intelligence and Christian intelligence professionals, and participated in a broad “traitorous conspiracy” to reduce the situation of Donald Trump.

Gabbard responds to the issuance of the account of those informed of the violations, which explains in detail the pressure applied to it to agree to a fake assessment that Russia overlaps in the 2016 elections to help Trump.

“I was pressured to change my views,” as the intelligence analyst, who turned to those who were informed, claimed.

His boss told him in January 2017: “There are reports that are not allowed to see that, if you see it, you will agree.

Violations repeatedly tried to report his fears about ICA’s fraudulent officials of several government officials, including the Inspector General of the Intelligence Society and former Special Adviser John Durham, but he was rejected and ignored.

‘Consequences’

“There must be consequences,” White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller told the Fox News Maria Barteromo on Sunday.

“Because, if we have a country in which we can continue to obtain a profession at the FBI and CIA professionals, Vasamne Al -Aqib, who will make evidence and evidence … to try to follow their political enemies, even including the president, if we continue to create the impression and the fact that there is no criminal penalty, it is a serious direction for such behavior, we will never stop.”

Yes, this is not about researching the rear vision mirror or following the simple diet diodes, as Trump’s critics say.

It comes to accounting viewers as a deterrent, restoring the integrity of our intelligence institutions, law enforcement, and correcting a historical error made against the American people.