
The solution solution solution must be canceled 2- Israel must be protected from Hamas
A few months after Adolf Hitler began in World War II, Winston Churchill summarized the intelligence of the reason for breaking the hopes of Europe in peace.
“One of the presidents is the person who nourishes a crocodile, in the hope that he will finally eat it,” the new Prime Minister said in a speech.
His bright images mocked the foolish efforts to get rid of the war, led by Churchill’s ancestor, Neville Chamberlain, who insisted on Hitler really wanted peace.
Chamberlain was imaginary and his name, which followed his name turned into a permanent warning about weaknesses.
However, we go here again, as the current leaders of Britain, France and Canada are in the trap.
Their concerns are that the Palestinians, including Hamas and other terrorist groups, really want peace and will live in harmony with Israel as soon as they have their own nation.
the Upbringing It is the recovery of our time.
He travels under the camouflage of the “two -state solution”.
Who can be against the solution?
“River to the sea”
With the exception of the Palestinian state, nothing will be resolved.
Quite the opposite, it will pave the stage for another round of blood control.
As such, think about it as an illusion of the two countries.
This is due to the reason that many Islamists, from Iran to Arab lands and around the world, are still committed to the destruction of the Jewish state.
They do not want to live in peace with Israel.
They want to eliminate it.
This is the essence I heard the anti -Semitic chant On the campus of the American universities: “From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free.”
Translation: Palestine will be free of Jews, and Israel will not be more.
This is not a problem with the Jewish United Nations, which held a two -day conference on this topic last week.

And a little noted that the Palestinians have already have their own case.
Instead of living in peace with their Jewish neighbors, they turned Gaza into a terrorist state.
Nearly two years after their barbaric invasion of Israel, and while they continue to keep some of the 250 hostages who took on October 7 of 2023, the batch to give them a nation is not just a fool – it is obscene.
As President Trump properly said last week, “You are rewarding enthusiasm if you are doing it. I don’t think it should be rewarded.”
Fortunately, he added that the United States is “not in this camp”, referring to the support of a Palestinian state by the British Prime Minister Care StarmerFrench President Emmanuel Macron and Prime Minister in Canada Mark Carney.
Each of them suffers from radical Islamic immigrants, and thus explains their screams for Churchill about feeding the crocodile in the hope of avoiding it.
They are assisted and incited by the Western media that fell on the trick of the two countries.
“Hamas State”
Modely is an uncertain unconfirmed control of the Associated Press, which described the United Nations Conference as a dangerous offer to “end one of the longest conflicts in the world.”
He claimed that “the plan will be crowned with an independent and equipped Palestine with the weapon of Palestine along with Israel.”
This is a fairy story, and at least deserves to warn that it will be necessary to implement a peaceful Palestinian state to ensure Israel’s security.

Good luck to persuade the Israelis that their security can be used by external sources of the United Nations.
The Jews there and around the world said for decades: “If the Palestinians put their rifles, there will be peace. But if the Israelis put our guns, there will be no Israel.”
The foreign minister of the Jewish nation, Jadaoun, said last week that Israel would not rise to “international pressure.”
Saar said: “The establishment of a Palestinian state today is the establishment of a Hamas state. A jihadist state.”
“This will not happen.”
The only positive development that comes out of the conference was that the Arab League, including the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Egypt, Jordan and Turkey, condemned for the first time the invasion of Hamas 2023 and called the terrorists to launch all hostages, remove their arms and end their rule in Gaza.
But even this progress was undermined through the tone of both lady who included obscene attacks on Israel because of how it responded to the invasion.
The final declaration also urges Israel to cooperate with United Nations agencies, including UNRWA, whose employees frankly had Hamas horror fire.
He is also defending the Ministry of Health in Ghazan, which works as a mouthwoman in Hamas to distort Palestinian losses.
The farce of the “right of return”
Worse, the conference supported the so -called “right of return” to the places in Israel that they left or were expelled during the establishment of Israel in 1948.
This would undermine Israel’s security and existence as a Jewish state.
My view is informed about payment for a Palestinian state by 25 years of covering the issue.
In the summer of 2000, I was on my first trip to Israel before Prime Minister, Ehud Barak, and Palestinian President Yasser Arafat in the interview of President Bill Clinton at Camp David to settle the conditions and limits of such a state.
The American embassy helped arrange an interview with me with a senior aide in Ramallah, the actual capital of the West Bank.
The night before the interview, the late Martin Indic, the American ambassador to Israel, suggested a question that I might ask.
Something like this ran: If Arafat could not accept 92 % of the West Bank government offered by the Barak government, how will Arafat feel when a more conservative government offers up to 72 % of the West Bank?
When I asked the question, Arafat’s assistant answered with a phrase he used in response to other questions about Arab violence.
He said, “Well, as you know, there are these groups that we cannot control.”
Names did not mention, but its meaning was clear: there will be violence against the Israelis, but Arafat does not blame him because he could not stop him.
No partner in peace
It was a comfortable lie, but it is clear that the terrorist leader was afraid of his life if he fell.
Big to the shock of Clinton and Barack, Arafat moved away from Camp David without accepting a Palestinian state.
Since then, many Israeli governments have made similar offers to a Palestinian state.
All of them were partially rejected due to SADAT example.
I remember that the bold leader of Egypt, Anwar El Sadat, was assassinated in 1981 by Islamic extremists two years after the signing of the peace treaty with Israeli Prime Minister Minashim begins with a process facilitated by President Jimmy Carter at Camp David.
Sadat Winyal participated in the Nobel Peace Prize for the year 1978.
However, after 47 years, there is still any Palestinian state because no Palestinian leader felt safe enough to identify Israel’s right to exist in its safe borders.
Hamas has made it clear that it would never accept Israel. Her leaders have promised that given the opportunity, the horrors of October 7 will be repeated over and over again.
Threats prove that the point that the Israelis have clarified about the Palestinians are still prevailing: we have no peace partner.
Post Comment