Tolsi Gabbard explains the reason for Russia’s belief that Hillary Clinton’s victory is “inevitable”
The Russians were unilaterally felt that it was “inevitable” that Hillary Clinton would win in the 2016 elections, said the director of National Intelligence, Toulcy Gabbar On Miranda Devin, “POD Force OnePodcast.
Despite the wide -ranging accounts that Russia was in the corner of President Trump, Moscow’s goal is to sow chaos in the American political process and restore itself to the presidency of Clinton, as Gabbard claimed, citing the study of the intelligence documents issued by its team.
“He surprised me that all these documents are still in full frankness,” Gabbard said in an episode released on Wednesday. As we learned in the subsequent documents that we reviewed during that campaign, Russia believed that Hillary Clinton would win the elections.
“They felt unavoidable.”
Last month, the Gabbard team began to unveil a set of documents that gave a look behind the scenes on the intelligence community’s machinations during the 2016 electoral cycle with regard to achieving Russian intervention.
This included a Report of the Intelligence Committee in the House of Representatives Since 2020 who claimed that the Russians may have had intelligence that Clinton “was placed on a daily system of” heavy attackers “, while they are afraid of loss.”
This was supposed to be because of its alleged emotional problems, including uncontrolled seizures of anger, aggression and joy. “
Gabbard thought about the reason not to leak this supposed Russian intelligence to the public if Moscow’s main goal was to support Trump and Cleunton.
She said: “If Russia is looking to help Trump to elect, which is said by the evaluation of the intelligence community manufactured in January 2017 with high confidence, according to Brenan and Clabper, Putin had released the most harmful information and email messages to help President Trump.”
“It was intentionally blocked and was not released because they assumed that Hillary Clinton would win that
“(It was) the waiting for days or weeks before it was installed to launch these documents.”
American officials have widespreadly claimed that the Russians had hacked emails for the National Democratic Committee during the 2016 campaign.
The report of the Intelligence Committee in the House of Representatives in 2020 concluded that “the main motives in these operations in these operations were undermining the belief in the American democratic process” and that he did not give priority to supporting one of the candidates for the other.
“The American people, as I think, and our republic, have been harmed more than that,” Gabbard said of the novel of collusion in Russia. “Of course, President Trump has passed the hell and his family because of Russia’s trick that President Obama made and managed.”
Critics, such as the former director of the CIA, accused John Brennan and the former director of national intelligence James Clapper Gabbard of financing “clearly false” accusations about their activities in Russia.
Many of Gabbard focused on rejection a 2017 Intelligence Society Rating (ICA)And that concluded from other things that “the Russian government has developed a clear preference for President Trump.”
Brennan, Clapper and others, referred to the Senate Intelligence Committee report for the year 2020, which indicated that the committee “has constantly heard that analysts were not under pressure from political motives to reach specific conclusions.”
Klbar and Brennan She drafted a cup Insist that the intelligence community report never referred to “collusion” between Trump and the Russian government, and stood up to their allegations that the Kremlin preferred him in the 2016 elections.
Tolsi Gabbard’s claims to Russia
Tolcy Gabbard’s demands focus on interfering in the elections on the evaluation of the controversial intelligence community for 2017, which President Barack Obama ordered to collect.
The report feeds Russia’s investigations against President Trump. Gabbard claims that the matter was a political function, claiming that Obama officials were intentionally used a complainant Intel and then lied to him.
Gabbard’s new claims are based on the report of the Intelligence Committee in the House of Representatives for the year 2020, which it publicly launched. Its results in some major roads differ from both the Obama report and the Senate Intelligence Committee report.
However, the Democrats refer to the Senate report, which was supported by the term at the time. Marco Rubio (R-FLA)-Now Foreign Minister Trump. This supports some of the results of the Obama report.
Below are the biggest points – what INTEL reports say fencing:
Steel file
- The report of the House of Representatives contradicts the allegations of Obama officials that they have never relied on the Steel Steel file – which was collected by the Hillary Clinton campaign – as part of the investigation of Russia.
- At the 2017 home session, Obama CIA Director John Brennan He denied that his agency used a steel file for intelligence assessments.
- However, the Steele Full file was still guaranteed to the Obama Intel report, as the public home report was recently found.
- In addition, according to the parliament’s report, Brennan, FBI director James Comey and director Andrew Maccabi pushed the Obama Intel report.
- The House of Representatives report said that senior Intel officials also faced Brennan about the legitimacy of the steel file, but he ignored it. Brennan’s response was, “Yes, but isn’t that true?”
- The Senate’s investigation found that the steel file was not used as part of the Obama Intel report.
Obama’s involvement
- Gabbard claimed on Wednesday that Obama ordered the creation of the 2017 Intel report and suggested that “he is subject to extraordinary directives directly from the president and the senior political appoinals.” She added: “Obama directed an evaluation of the intelligence community to be created, to strengthen this fabricated, fabricated narration that ultimately led to a year coup for an attempt to undermine President Trump’s presidency.”
- The Intel report in the Senate of 2020 confirmed that Obama ordered the drafting of the report, but he did not comment on political motives.
- “The strange allegations are ridiculous and a weak attempt in distraction,” Obama said.
Did Putin want Trump to win?
- “The goals of Russia were undermining the public belief in the American democratic process, distorting the secretary, Clinton, and harming its election” and that Putin had a “clear preference for President Trump.”
- But the parliament’s report contradicts this, saying that “Putin’s main motives in these operations were undermining the belief in the American democratic process.” It seems that the Russian powerful man is expected to win, and retracts “some binding materials for use after the elections against the expected Clinton administration.”
- The Senate report said that the legislators had given “specific intelligence reports to support the evaluation showed by Putin and the Russian government a Preferring the candidate Trump“
Did Russia change the 2016 elections?
- To support its allegations that the Obama Intel report was political intervention, it highlighted the results of multiple intelligence agencies that Russia “had no intention or the ability to influence the results of the American election.”
- In this, all three reports are agreed.
Gabbard referred to how Obama requested ICA from Russian intervention for the year 2017 in the 2016 elections and the intrigue of his detailed management in emptying the document to accuse the 44th President of sabotage.
“What we know now came from President Obama is a secret task, mainly, to sabotage the will of the American people, and to create this lie that would challenge the legitimacy of President Trump’s election and four years of his administration, which led to the influence of what was already a long coup for years.”
Obama’s representatives have refuted these characteristics, saying that “strange allegations are ridiculous and weak in distraction.”
“Nothing in the document released last week undermines the acceptable conclusion on a large scale that Russia has worked to influence the 2016 presidential elections, but it has not successfully manipulated any votes,” Obama spokesman Patrick Rodbush said in a statement.
Gabbard has made referrals to the Ministry of Justice based on its results, and the Ministry of Justice has formed a “strike force” since then to comb the claims.
Share this content:
Post Comment