Trump and trade wars pushed Russia and Ukraine into the cold

In the main times – and trade wars on the news agenda – it is easy to forget that soldiers from Russia and Ukraine are fighting for every inch Frontline region in Ukraine.

Geographical-political landscape and opposition, ‘Power of Power’, including the current financial uncertainty and strengthening of the US and Europe, are also in the heart of the global policymakers, and the agenda is brought down for more than three and a half years in Ukraine.

This week’s discussion in Istanbul, includes negotiation teams on both sides, and the media has only mentioned that both Russia and Ukraine are being released in the cold. As things stand up, there is an unhealthy air when it ignores the potential of war and the potential for peace.

On July July 2, when Trump looked at his courage, it turns out that Ukraine could get more weapons made by the United States-as long as NATO’s allies paid for them- and Russia gave Russia a 50 -day deadline to make a peace agreement with Ukraine. If that doesn’t happen, they said, “Russia will face” severe “approval and” secondary “rates up to 100%.

They can be strongly hit by Russia, as well as the rest of the business partner, including India and China, Who buy Russian oil and gasIn other items.

As things stand out, Russia is to indicate that it is serious about the ceasefire and peace plan till September 2 – on which a little progress has been made, Despite some agreement about the exchanging prisoner??

Analysts suspect that more approval would push Russian President Vladimir Putin to come to the negotiation table with a good faith, let the Ukrainian President Volodamir Zelensky speak.

Trump has a tension between the demand for a peace agreement and the next approval, said Billykov, Research of Ukraine’s National Institute for Strategic Studies.

“The Kremlin is generally banking on the fact that the United States is unable to support Ukraine under Trump and put a systematic policy on Russia,” Bellykov told the NBC News in early July.

“Serious secondary restrictions need to be argued with China and India, who buy raw materials from Russia,” he said.

“Similarly, when weapons are considered here and now, it is important, so, so many are unknown. And I think Russia believes that the US will not dare to impose secondary restrictions on Russia’s commercial partners,” he added.

Ukraine, the United States and the European, have shown more preparations to negotiate in the last few months, calling Trump for a war with Russia.

If Moscow has been given a ‘Holy Greel’ for the Russian-Violent Ukrainian region: NATO’s membership is ready to compromise.

But there is no sign that the strategy has made a small but increased profit due to the intense force of the manpower and intense drone on the ratfield, which will be ready to accept Western-standard security guarantee for Ukraine.

Last week, KYIV protested in KYIV in the wake of the government’s move to limit the independence of two anti -corruption agencies. EU EU politicians expressed garbage on this movement To the polytico outletBy saying that, the lack of commitment to pursuing European democratic values. Facing the local corruption in Ukraine is essential for the EU member, which is written by Kiev.

The government’s turnaround in the middle of July was also accused of focusing on loyalists, which could also cause concern among Ukraine’s international supporters and beneficiaries.

Senior colleagues and political analysis company of Carnegi Russia Eurasia Center. According to Politic founder Tatiana Stanovaya, Ukraine is entering “a serious phase of integration of external uncertainty”.

“The latest developments in the battlefield are compatible with the new American posture: Donald Trump has chosen a strategic delay for decisive investment and economic and political responsibilities in Europe.

“In the meantime, Kiev is using this inward regeneration internally. Recent government revisions … Underline the Zelensky administration’s political control and maintains the integration of pesmism, organizational inertia and an intense labor crisis,” she continued.

Despite the western discomfort in the Ukraine’s domestic launch, Stanovaya noted that “international support is becoming more practical, which is mainly ready to retain the front line rather than progressing democracy.”