Trump takes controversial legal action against sellers online who claim to sell fake Mirsh

Donald Trump A. suit Against the vendors of goods whose name was not revealed in a local American court in Florida on Friday, on the pretext of merchants via multiple online platforms such as Wal MartAmazon and Ebay sold a “minimum tradition” of cups, children’s clothes, shirts and other things that carry the Trump brand.

The complaint said: “The defendants announce incorrectly,/or marketing and/or selling unauthorized and illegal products that violate part of the Trump brands to the plaintiffs at least.” “By selling fake products that they claim are real products and authorized to use Trump brands … defendants cause confusion and deception in the market.”

Trump’s sale has proven to be profitable to some, as about 9,000 Amazon seller has achieved approximately $ 140 million of revenues in the months before the elections. Data From the omnise and e -commerce marketing platform.

Controversy in the legal strategy

Trump’s decision to prosecute these sellers in a special way has raised questions from legal experts. The group chose a Determine the date of the caseThere is a legal trend that has turned into popularity among some brand lawyers in recent decades, because it allows the plaintiff, in many cases, the skirt fees and the generation of severing change in general from settlements, according to legal experts.

As e -commerce giants Enhancing third -party marketsLegal concerns about DUPE sales have grown, and prosecutors may want to throw an extensive network to hold the alleged violators accountable. Unlike many cases of violation of brands, the A table for the plaintiff allows the prosecution of a wide range of defendants without having to name certain entities – such as the names of sellers specified online – under their care are foreign sellers. This blanket allows the plaintiff to avoid paying expensive fees for each entity.

Issues also give a great authority to appreciate the judge. In many cases, a complaint from the sheet boiler will determine the allegations against the fake, who committed the highest level of violation of brands, according to what he said Sarah FakrilProfessor of Intellectual Property Law at the College of Law at Chicago. She said that part of this strategy is a rhetorical, in order to say before the judge that these unknown “bad actors” should be responsible. luck.

At this point, the judge can decide to freeze the accounts of applicants online for alleged alleged goods – without telling the sellers that they have been prosecuted by the plaintiff. It is often equipped with some means of obtaining legal assistance after submitting it, these sellers usually choose a settlement with the plaintiff instead of employing lawyers to fight the case.

Fakril told luck. “This creates … an incredible incentive either for a settlement or default only, depending on the amount of money you have or your business model.”

According to Vekril, dozens can be prosecuted to up to 1,000 selves in these cases.

“This is the game,” she said. “This is really unusual. This is not usually how federal litigation goes.”

The American Provincial Court in the Florida region, the Tamba-complaint Division No. 8: 25-CV-01962

Legal procedures concerns

What matters to some legal experts is that many sellers have been informed that their accounts are frozen via email, with some discovery that they were named to defendants in legal cases of these emails. Fakril said that while some of these sellers can be sophisticated, others are probably no. But because of the comprehensive body from the defendants that were created through Table A, the legal system does not always differentiate sufficiently between these parties, and they punish the smaller seller in the same way as they run wide operations.

“There are many reasons for concern about the due legal procedures, and these defendants are a kind of exposure to railways, whether they have committed anything wrong or not,” Fakrill said.

In 2023, A woman’s court in Florida ordered the payment of $ 250,000 As part of a campaign on unauthorized goods after only sold 360 dollars of acrobat through the similarity of rural music Luke Comp over the Amazon. The woman told the media that she found legal notification in her unwanted folder, but she was absent from the deadline for the response, as she was in the hospital, and then ordered to pay legal damage.

Other sellers in the case seem to be larger than Asia. Combs I apologize After knowing the lawsuits and offered to help pay the price of women’s medical bills.

Why is Trump now sued?

Since many of these situations are under SEAL, it is difficult to distinguish the amount of money that prosecutors can earn from Table A, although Fackrell said that some lawyers have admitted that it is a strategy to bring some money.

She said: “At least some of these plaintiffs are sold to coordinate this litigation as an alternative source of revenue.”

The specific reason why Trump filed a lawsuit violation of the brand is not clear, Amy LandersProfessor of Intellectual Property Law at Thomas R. Klein from the Faculty of Law at Draxel University, luck. She said that some brands do not feel that they are obliged to follow up on copyright against unauthorized sellers because Mirch can act effectively as free ads.

Trademarks such as Chanel Louis Vuitton may be the opposite MoreSuppose Landers, where luxury companies want to prevent their commercial signs from becoming public and meaningless. But for Trump, unauthorized goods were made for more than a decade, which raised questions about the reason that the group has now chosen to take legal measures against these alleged violators.

“If there are other people selling Mirch and they are not allowed, it may eventually seem a year,” Landers said. “But this is not intuitive for me, because … there has been no right to enforce yet.

Trump did not respond luckRequest to comment.