Washington Post slammed judges to withhold medical abortion funds

Washington Post’s editorial circle slammed in the Obama-Nedious US district Judge trying to cancel the colony To prevent the “Congress work” by giving a primary order to withdraw the Congress’s decision to eliminate medical funds from abortion providers such as planned Parantood.

Post editorial argued On Tuesday, some of the Trump administration’s federal funding efforts faced proper investigation to overtake the Congress, while the Republican tried to reduce medical funds for abortion care.

“It is the main potential of the Congress to distribute public money. Yet the US District Judge Indira Talwan not only resisted the cost of the Congress under the preliminary order, but she refused to make his ruling appeal,” This is the case of the court, “he said. Trump administration Fodder for attacks on judges. “

Federal judges stopped the Trump administration from dismissing some of the scheduled parents’ facilities

The Washington Post argued that the Republican had to dissolve the authority from the abortion providers to reduce the decision by the District Judge’s decision to ruin the federal funds and the district judge to rule against expenses. (Kevin Carter/Getty Image)

The Taxes and expenses bills July was signed in the law on July, with a provision that by October 1, some tax-suiting organizations that are abortion do not get reimbursement from Medicide. After the Bill Act, the planned guardianship filed a immediate claim on the federal government, as they began to lose a large part of their federal funding.

Talwani agreed with the planned guardianship and ruled that this provision is an unconstitutional “attaier bill”, which imposes legal punishment on a specific group without a court case and mentioned that the concept included in the “assembly punishment.”

“There are no doubt that many Congress Republicans who voted for this harmony bill, do not like abortion and want to deny planned parenting because it is the leading abortion provider in the country. “The budget process is basically political and the decision to tax and spend the Congress always helps some groups and hurt others.”

Click here for more coverage of media and culture

Planned parenting sign. Federal judges have paused from the implementation of a large amount of tax and expenditure bill to the Trump administration, which can prevent medical funds for planned guardianship health centers. (Vesley Was/AFP by Gatey images)

According to the post, the Congress “stress” to use its expense conscience to impose unconstitutional labels, saying that in the medical provision, “planned parenting members must stop selective abortion,” and this would prevent them from being involved in the basic part of their actions. “

“But the Congress has no bounds to grant the operation of any group,” the outlet denied. “If the budget measures that appear next are examined, then it can be examined as a bill of bills, then the financial work of the Congress will be stuck.”

The appeal is likely to be reversed on the appeal of the Talwani, but her decision is “the judiciary as well as the executive officer can overlay the cost of the Congress and damage the separation of the rights.

At the time of closure, the editorial board proposes that the Congress decision to turn to the medical fund that is far from abortion service, went through the proper constitutional process, regardless of whether a person personally agree to this policy, and more than the executive order is eligible.

Activists who oppose funds for planned guardianship demonstrates before the US Supreme Court on Wednesday, April 2, 2025. ((Bill Clark/CQ-Roll Call, via Gateti))

Click here to get the Fox News app

“Social conservatives have advanced one of their long -term assembly priorities by blocking the funds of abortion providers. In the future, to protect those funds, liberals need to do this in 2026 and 2028,” the post concluded. “The court’s Fiat cannot take the option of democratic validity.”