William Shiple: Darham Annx tells us about Russia’s deceit

William Shiple: Darham Annx tells us about Russia’s deceit

NewYou can now listen to Fox News Articles!

On July 31 and August 1, the New York Times operates two stories of the cold water pour on the release of the previously classified “Ne Nex”. Special Advice John Darham’s report Date 23 May 20223. But the writers-Chaly Service and Adam Goldman have directed their readers’ attention from the beginning to non-Ishu.

Times, Washington Post, Polytico, Network News and other Legisi Media have focused on the report of Myopically FBI. Crossfire Hurricane Inspection President Trump – Which we know that the FBI, CIA and Obama White House were “fake”.

Jonathan Turley: Democrats have pulled the biggest political career on the American people so far. This is finally revealing

Unlike the FBI reacted to the Australian diplomat about the meeting in the London Bar, the FBI first received the Russian intelligence information in July 1, 2016 – a part of Darham’s inspection, the FBI, virtually – virtually nothing.

The first part of Anex includes previous classified information about receiving “Special Intelligence” from a favorable government in the first part of 2016, showing real-time knowledge of the mechanism under Russia’s Hillary Clinton’s 4 presidency’s presidential campaign.

The document is written by Anex Derham’s team. Source documents based on Russian Memo have not been given – or at least public – referring to the paraffing/source of Russian Memo, the accuracy is unknown. All of these qualifications go to the work of “analysis” – what this document is, where it occurs, what it says, what it depends, it can be confirmed separately, the value of the material, etc. What is your confidence in accurately accepting above?

JOHN-DURHAM-TESTIFIES William Shiple: Darham Annx tells us about Russia's deceit

John Darham testifies to the House Judiciary Committee on Wednesday, June 20, 2023. (Screenshot/House Judiciary Committee)

Two items that have attracted the most attention and focus on the stories of the Times, written by Leonard Bernardo on July 25 and July 27, 2016. Bernardo worked for George Soros-related element. His email was hacked and he was communicated with the senior WITH of the Clinton Campaign.

There are no real “emails” in Annex because they may be found on Bernardo’s computer or on the recipient’s computer – they have no special email format. What they see is that the versions of the text in the main part of the email were translated into Russian Memo, in Russian Memo English, in which Derham translated and pasted English in his report.

The “Email” of July 25 includes Hillary Clinton that the “Foreign Policy Advisor” has alleged that the then advanced Donald Trump had approved the plan to “dispose of” the Russia Press. Putin.

About a Russian language memo – we do not know the date – Darham provides an English translation that includes the following:

“According to the Hillary Clinton’s election headquarters received by the US Soros Foundation on July 26, 2016, Clinton approved her strategic adviser Juliana Smith’s plan… to make the Donald Trump connected with the Russian Special Services connected with the Russian Special Services for the benefit of the Republican candidate.”

comey-brennan-composite William Shiple: Darham Annx tells us about Russia's deceit

James Come, former US lawyer and FBI director testified before the Senate Intelligence Committee, Washington DC, June 8, 2017. (Photo by Mark Renstine/Corbis) Washington, DC – July 13: John Brain, director of the Central Intelligence Agency, discussed his agency’s strategy in the Match of the Brookings Institute. Brain said the “enhanced inquiry technique” exposed after the 9/11 attacks, even if the “enhanced inquiry technique” was revealed, but if the new president ordered the re -use of the new president, he will not lead the CIA. (Photos of Chip Somodwilli/Getty images) (Gateie image)

The Russian Memo further says “As Smith imagined….” This suggests that Smith’s Smith has described Smith’s plan herself, of the documents supporting Memo, or someone familiar with the details to describe it.

“As Smith imagined the theme of Putin’s Trump at the Olympic scandal level, by increasing the theme of ‘Putin’s support’ theme will divert the attention of the components through the inspection of the compromised electronic correspondence of Clinton.”

The Russian Memo, which has information about July in July, July, has been described in the next 3 days for the next 3 days – the goal of the plan “Trump is considered to be Putin’s support”. ”

Russian Memo goes ahead:

“Obama” Obama-Wava “through cyberpaspace” through cyberpaspace “to work through cyberpace (national power supply networks to the public) after (the masses) must be equivalent to the people’s efforts to influence the political process through cyberpace.”

Memo says that the clinch campaign will try to increase the importance of the Russian election intervention – which happens in every election – by equating the attacks on important national infrastructure and combining Putin and Trump, that is, Putin’s intervention is a proxy of Trump’s democracy.

FBI’s controversial Trump-Russia’s actions with ‘worrying specificity’ by foreign artists: Source

Either Russian Intelligence Services are noticed and playing lottery every week, or they continued to wander between people related to the clinton campaign, explaining the game plan implemented by the campaign and the White House, CIA and FBI.

On July 27, the email given to Bernardo was literally small in terms of what Darham had done as a verbat, and the Clinton confirmed that the “idea of Julia” was approved.

The authors of the Times reported that Darham called the two Bernardo email “fake” – and they said they were “integrated” by Russian intelligence. Therefore, according to Times, all the controversies around the release of the Annex Material were made irrelevant by finding it.

But Darham did not conclude that the email was fake. What did he conclude?

The “best assessment” of his team was the “composit” – some of the text of each of the text was taken from other sources and combined in the text that appears as “email” under Bernardo’s name.

It is clear that Bernardo did not write them, meaning they are not “genuine”.

But it is also obvious that some of the content of each of the materials was accurate – and in the next 100 days, the events are estimated by the events.

Darham reached that conclusion only after the long and involved process designed to understand both what the emails are and how much of special intelligence was accurate.

Everything – and I have to say everything – the FBI made Darham to answer these questions in August 1, 2016 or not.

Derham asked Intelligence analyzes – FBI and CIA most likely – if the email looks genuine. Most said they did it. Some mentioned that Bernardo was actually a victim of hacking, so if his email was in the hands of the Russian people, it would not be surprising. It was mentioned by some that the original information taken from the source documents would have been fake or changed by the Russians.

Some analysts believed that the email appeared to be genuine, so it should be enough to push the FBI into action. But he did nothing.

Darham interviewed Bernardo and showed him an email. The FBI has never done so. Bernardo said they did not recognize them, and they had a language that would not have been used – especially the sentence “FBI will be kept in more oil on fire later.”

george-soros-hillary-clinton William Shiple: Darham Annx tells us about Russia's deceit

It is difficult to judge the intelligence translated from a foreign language. Bernardo refused to use this phrase, but from a very similar phrase that is normally used by the original English speaker – how far is “insert gas on fire”? Bernardo’s original document went into English – then translated in Russian – then the Russian version was translated back to English. Thus “gas on fire” ends as “fire oil”.

They did not know who the “Julie” was referenced in the July 25 email, Bernardo said.

But he mentioned that the last sentence in the email of July 25 was written something that “things are terrible for the US-Russian relationship”.

Derham collected documents with Grand Juri Subpowns and Search Worthy. He searched the documents received by the Russian hackers. According to emails July 25 and July 27, Darham did not find out of the Soros Foundation’s emails.

But he found other emails – either the email or attachment of the emails sent by people to either Bernardo – with the same language similar to Bernardo. Specifically, a passage from the July 25 email was taken directly from the email written by Tim Maur, who worked for the carnagi endment as a cyber expert. Maur had never seen the Bernardo email, but he agreed that he had taken a road from an email sent to the colleague at Carnegi – and hacked by the Russians.

Darham also interviewed Julian Smith, who was a foreign policy adviser to the Clinton Campaign, and joined himself in an attempt to raise the risk of Putin-Strap with the US national security.

Click here for the opinion of more Fox News

It is noteworthy that Darham started this part as follows:

“Smith said she does not especially remember proposing a plan of leadership of Clinton or other campaigns to try to tie Trump to Putin and Russia.”

This phrase is never accidental – “especially I don’t remember” If a document emerges later, you have left more space to get yourself out, claiming what you do not remember. The agent is trained to notice such sentences as mentioned by the interviewer.

Smith says that “this is possible” she has proposed ideas for the leadership of the campaign “who may have recognized those ideas.” Again – Darham is showing her an email for the “Clinton plan” and she has killed her and does not believe what other documents that she do not show her.

Click here to get the Fox News app

Although she didn’t remember much about anything, she had a thing that she had never tried that she would have never tried.

Before Derham, the FBI has done none of these – and why never explained it.

The issue was Darham’s Ne Nexon.

Click here for more from William Shiple

Share this content:

Post Comment